GitHub[208K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Nano Banana 2.1

  1. Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogle
  2. Nano Banana 2.1GoogleHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite0/10045/10049/10092/10083/1007/100
Nano Banana 2.150/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder28/10033/10067/1000/100 — Tool calling not supported
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
131K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video, Audio, Pdf
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text, Image
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$1.50/ 1M
Output
$2.50/ 1M
$7.50/ 1M
Cached input
$0.03/ 1M
Unknown
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
0
No usage
Completed sessions
4
No usage
Token share
0%
No usage
Tokens
00%
No usage
No trend data
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.